The UK is likely to experience hotter drier summers, and wetter milder winters. One of the plans for the UK is called "Future Water". This plan requires water companies to prepare for extreme drought by 2030. Even though the UK is vulnerable for drought, they are also at risk for extreme flooding. The Thames Estuary 2100 Project is a program meant to help manage tidal flood risks in the area. According to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, "the final plan for the Thames Estuary 2100 Project will be flexible enough to ensure that it can be adapted if sea level rises faster or storm surges become more intense than anticipated".
![]() |
| Picture from : http://www.skepticalscience.com/pics/measurementslarge500.jpg |
A few of the plans for planning and construction interested me as well. They are planning on building more eco-towns that will be more adaptable to climate change. They will introduce higher standards for buildings and install more permeable surfaces that will absorb storm water. Builders will also have to take into account changes in temperature making houses more efficient.
One of the most interesting things in the IPCC reports adaptation section was the heat wave of 2003. During the summer months (June through August) of 2003 most of Europe experienced an extreme heat wave. Temperatures were on average 3-5 degrees Celsius warmer than normal. During June temperatures were 6 degrees Celsius warmer and 7 degrees Celsius warmer during August. July was only 1-3 degrees Celsius warmer. This extreme change in temperature greatly impacted much of Europe's agriculture. An estimated 13 billion dollars worth of damage was reported, and over 35,000 lives were lost due to the heat. Since this devastating event, many places in Europe have put in place and early heat wave warning system. A few of the countries participating in this are France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, the UK and Hungary. In the occurrence of another extreme heat wave, hopefully this system can warn people and prevent as many lives from being lost.
The UK is part of the Kyoto protocol. The UK is part of the European Union, a union with 15 members who have committed to reducing emissions by 8% as a whole. The UK has specifically committed to reduce emissions by 12.5% relative to a base year. According to UNFCC the UK reduced its emissions by 15.1% from the Kyoto base year until 2004.
The UK is very committed to reducing emissions and is starting to think about many more renewable energy sources. From Q2 of 2012 to Q2 of 2013 the UK increased renewable electricity energy from 9.4% to 15.5%. The UK is using onshore and offshore wind, Solar PV, hydro, and bioenergy to help increase efficiency and reduce emissions. The following graph is from:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/255182/UK_Renewable_Energy_Roadmap_-_5_November_-_FINAL_DOCUMENT_FOR_PUBLICATIO___.pdf
Personally I think the UK needs to both start adapting to the climate change, and continue mitigating. The UK does not play anywhere near the role in emitting greenhouse gasses as say the U.S. or China, but they do still play a role. Choosing to invest in clean energy is a great way to help reduce their emissions and ultimately save money. No matter how much mitigation the UK decides to do their emissions are small compared to the rest of the world as combined, and they are so vulnerable to climate change to begin with they need to have adaptation policies in place as well just incase the rest of the world doesn't reduce their emissions and climate change continues to increase drastically. I think the reason they need to do both is because every little bit that each country does to reduce emissions helps, but you need to be able to protect your own country as well and expect the worst.


